Page 322 Treating taxpayers like investors in federal student aid. Taxpayersshould expect their investments in higher education to generate economicproductivity. When the federal government lends
Page 319 Federal education policy should be limited and, ultimately, the federal Department of Education should be eliminated. When power is exercised, it should empower
Page 307 Despite the importance of agricultural biotechnology, in 2016, Congress passeda federal mandate to label genetically engineered food.113 This legislation was arguably just a
Page 303 Work with lawmakers to eliminate CEP. The NSLP and SBP should bedirected to serve children in need, not become an entitlement for studentsfrom
Page 299 Reform SNAP. Ostensibly, SNAP sends money through electronic-benefit-transfer (EBT) cards to help “low-income” individuals buy food. It is the largest of the federal
Page 298 Separate the agricultural provisions of the farm bill from the nutrition provisions. To have genuine reform and proper consideration of the issues, agricultural
Page 296 Ideally, repeal the ARC and PLC programs. Farmers eligible to participate in ARC or PLC are generally already able to purchase federal crop
Page 293 Remove the U.S. from any association with U.N. and other efforts to pushsustainable-development schemes connected to food production.
Page 286 The next Secretary of Energy will similarly have much work to do. Under thenext President, the Department of Energy should end the Biden
Page 285 In contrast to DOJ’s long history, the Department of Education (the department, or ED), discussed by Lindsey Burke in Chapter 11, is a
Load More